MQC Simulator

A numerical model and its visual representation

An illustrative intended journey, not a demonstration of the current live release.

1. Choose SGPE-model parameters.
2. Evolve the field in a computation worker.
3. Transfer state through the data bridge.
4. Compare the 3D presentation with model metrics.

System components

• Physics worker: numerical field evolution outside the UI thread.
• Data bridge: model-array representation and transfer.
• Three.js renderer: mapping data into a 3D scene.
• React controls and lifecycle hooks: worker, visualization and audio ownership.

Architecture & ownership

Computation, data transfer and rendering are separate. A rendering change is not a change to, or validation of, the numerical method.

How can numerical accuracy be tested independently of rendering quality and speed?

What to validate before use

Not experimental observation of macroscopic quantum coherence. FPS and allocation goals are not measured guarantees.

This describes the development scope. This page does not run the product, process payments or verify real-time availability.

Related products, distinct problems

• EvoSphere

  Explore how local organism rules and environmental conditions change population behavior.

• The Algorithmic Universe

  Study emergent structure as rules and parameters change, keeping mathematical ideas separate from observations.

• Phi · MATRIX-CORE

  Separate an experiment from execution control while retaining its parameters and results.

• SRE · HAM

  Test an alternative semantic-representation model through usable programming interfaces.

• Project Open Gate

  Test whether a signal survives alternative explanations instead of turning a high score into a claim about reality.

• DVC · Project Apu

  Preserve observation provenance and distinguish source objects from candidates, computed relationships and hypotheses.